Mack A. Damia wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:05:59 +0000, W-Dockery @news.novabbs.com
> (W-Dockery ) wrote:

>>Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>>
>>> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
>>> they all wanted to buy it.
>>
>>
>>Do you have a scan of it online?
>>
>>I'd like to see it.

> Note that the gallery refers to it as an etching, contrary to Bozo
> Pendragon's claim that it is a lithograph.

> https://www.chairish.com/product/3270864/1956-nu-de-dos-figurative-reverse-etching-by-pablo-picasso-framed

> Click on the image to enlarge. The reverse lettering is no mistake.
> It is known as the "1956 “Nu De Dos” Figurative Reverse Etching."

Back to the topic, it looks legitimate to me.

HTH and HAND.

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 9:30:13 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:05:59 +0000, W-Dockery @news.novabbs.com
> > (W-Dockery ) wrote:
> >>Mack A. Damia wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
> >>> they all wanted to buy it.
> >>
> >>
> >>Do you have a scan of it online?
> >>
> >>I'd like to see it.
>
> > Note that the gallery refers to it as an etching, contrary to Bozo
> > Pendragon's claim that it is a lithograph.
>
> > https://www.chairish.com/product/3270864/1956-nu-de-dos-figurative-reverse-etching-by-pablo-picasso-framed
>
> > Click on the image to enlarge. The reverse lettering is no mistake.
> > It is known as the "1956 “Nu De Dos” Figurative Reverse Etching."
> Back to the topic, it looks legitimate to me.
>
> HTH and HAND.

Good for you, Donkey.

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 9:30:13 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
>> Mack A. Damia wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:05:59 +0000, W-Dockery @news.novabbs.com
>> > (W-Dockery ) wrote:
>> >>Mack A. Damia wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
>> >>> they all wanted to buy it.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Do you have a scan of it online?
>> >>
>> >>I'd like to see it.
>>
>> > Note that the gallery refers to it as an etching, contrary to Bozo
>> > Pendragon's claim that it is a lithograph.
>>
>> > https://www.chairish.com/product/3270864/1956-nu-de-dos-figurative-reverse-etching-by-pablo-picasso-framed
>>
>> > Click on the image to enlarge. The reverse lettering is no mistake.
>> > It is known as the "1956 “Nu De Dos” Figurative Reverse Etching."
>> Back to the topic, it looks legitimate to me.
>>
>> HTH and HAND.

> Good for you

Thanks, ape boy.

🙂

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> Mack A. Damia wrote:
>
>> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
>> they all wanted to buy it.
>>
>> But NancyGene knows better.
>>
>> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
>>
>> She is a sad, lonely git.

> No one cares about your lithograph

You do not speak for everyone here, Penhead....!

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 4:10:14 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> > Mack A. Damia wrote:
> >
> >> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
> >> they all wanted to buy it.
> >>
> >> But NancyGene knows better.
> >>
> >> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
> >>
> >> She is a sad, lonely git.
>
> > No one cares about your lithograph
> You do not speak for everyone here, Penhead....!

Nor do you count as anyone here, Stink.

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 4:10:14 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
>> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>
>> > Mack A. Damia wrote:
>> >
>> >> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
>> >> they all wanted to buy it.
>> >>
>> >> But NancyGene knows better.
>> >>
>> >> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
>> >>
>> >> She is a sad, lonely git.
>>
>> > No one cares about your lithograph
>> You do not speak for everyone here, Penhead....!

> Nor do you count

Like Zod said, your biased opinion is worthless, Pendragon.

HTH and HAND.

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 4:10:14 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>
> >> > Mack A. Damia wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
> >> >> they all wanted to buy it.
> >> >>
> >> >> But NancyGene knows better.
> >> >>
> >> >> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
> >> >>
> >> >> She is a sad, lonely git.
> >>
> >> > No one cares about your lithograph
> >> You do not speak for everyone here, Penhead....!
>
> > Nor do you count
> Like Zod said, your biased opinion is worthless, Pendragon.
>
> HTH and HAND.

On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 4:10:14 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
> >>
> >> > Mack A. Damia wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
> >> >> they all wanted to buy it.
> >> >>
> >> >> But NancyGene knows better.
> >> >>
> >> >> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
> >> >>
> >> >> She is a sad, lonely git.
> >>
> >> > No one cares about your lithograph
> >> You do not speak for everyone here, Penhead....!
>
> > Nor do you count
> Like Zod said, your biased opinion is worthless, Pendragon.

Are you saying that I do speak for Stink?

Michael Pendragon wrote:

> On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
>> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>>
>> > On Thursday, January 5, 2023 at 4:10:14 PM UTC-5, Zod wrote:
>> >> Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Mack A. Damia wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
>> >> >> they all wanted to buy it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But NancyGene knows better.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> She is a sad, lonely git.
>> >>
>> >> > No one cares about your lithograph
>> >> You do not speak for everyone here, Penhead....!
>>
>> > Nor do
>
>> Like Zod said, your biased opinion is worthless, Pendragon.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> Are you saying

See above. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ash Wurthing wrote:

> On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 4:05:12 PM UTC-5, W-Dockery wrote:
>> ME wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday, 19 December 2022 at 15:27:15 UTC-5, michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 3:00:15 PM UTC-5, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:27:56 +0000, W.Dockery @news.novabbs.com
>> >> > (W.Dockery ) wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> On Monday, December 19, 2022 at 1:45:36 PM UTC-5, Mack A. Damia wrote:
>> >> > >>> I had my Picasso appraised by several galleries; it is authentic and
>> >> > >>> they all wanted to buy it.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> But NancyGene knows better.
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Does this group need any more proof that she(it) is mentally deranged?
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> She is a sad, lonely git.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> No one cares about your lithograph
>> >> > >
>> >> > >NancyGene seems to care.
>> >> > She is determined to deny that it is authentic, poor soul. She has
>> >> > never seen it. I was offered $500.00 for it, but considering I paid
>> >> > $1.65 for it, I won't sell it.
>> >> EARTH TO JAKE BARNES: You claimed that you had a Picasso etching.
>> >>
>> >> You lied (of course).
>> >>
>> >> NancyGene caught you at it, and explained that what you have (assuming the entire story isn't made up) is a lithograph.
>> >>
>> >> A lithograph would only be worth around $500-$800 dollars.
>> >>
>> >> The late, unlamented Pickles

Still obsessed with Stephan Pickering, I see.

>> > Michael, stop arguing xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Look who's talking.

> Yes, do look

I did.

🙂