novaBBS - rec.games.bridge - Re: Any Bailey Weak-2 Bidders Out There? (ATTN: Bo Yin)

Re: Any Bailey Weak-2 Bidders Out There? (ATTN: Bo Yin)

<5dfcec84-b027-41a0-80a1-dc91e52cfabcn@googlegroups.com>

https://news.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=123&group=rec.games.bridge#123

copy link Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:559:: with SMTP id o25mr8078303qko.200.1632225686548;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:ea84:: with SMTP id r4mr592452ooh.92.1632225686278;
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 05:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FDnb6.39400$GV2.8106190@typhoon.san.rr.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:44c8:4660:1ac:ad6d:d269:b56e:a969;
posting-account=KbTq4goAAAD_FCg3OZ1FUVH5wmBKhNWr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:44c8:4660:1ac:ad6d:d269:b56e:a969
References: <930mch$8m9$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <932dar$l2p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
<dB556.2229$GV2.488507@typhoon.san.rr.com> <U66hgEASu4V6Ew4K@cavendish.demon.co.uk>
<hbnj5tos92kafef8f1fiosulkh10idp0q5@4ax.com> <9030900B4obrickermydejanewsco@24.91.0.34>
<t6ofssdv8es071@corp.supernews.com> <3a6c43ba.6932751@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <FDnb6.39400$GV2.8106190@typhoon.san.rr.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5dfcec84-b027-41a0-80a1-dc91e52cfabcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Any Bailey Weak-2 Bidders Out There? (ATTN: Bo Yin)
From: fabulous...@gmail.com (Fabulous Pedigree)
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:01:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 32

by: Fabulous Pedigree - Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:01 UTC

On Wednesday, January 24, 2001 at 5:32:05 AM UTC+7, Marv wrote:
> "richard e. willey" wrote
> >
> > >"Otis Bricker" wrote
> > >
> > ><snip>
> > >
> > >> If yes, I wonder what would happen when you play a pair that
> > >says they play
> > >> very aggressive weak twos you tell them that you play card
> > >showing doubles
> > >> and you call the director after they pass a hand similar to one
> > >that you
> > >> had seen them open before. At least in ACBL land, I don't
> > >believe you are
> > >> allowed to vary your methods based on your opponents' defensive
> > >style.
....
> So, you can't change system because of an anticipated countermeasure (ACBL
> Election for L40E2, in the back of the Laws), and yet you can't be restricted
> from taking an action that is based on style/judgment....
> Marv
> San Diego, CA, USA

Interesting. I'd never heard of this being an issue (although this post is
closer to my vintage, date-wise :) ).

But I assume you can write "Weiss Doubles vs Bailey" on your convention card, no?

For that matter, can you write "Bailey 2-bids except vs Weiss doubles"?
That could lead to infinite regress!

James

The universe is all a spin-off of the Big Bang.

interests / rec.games.bridge / Re: Any Bailey Weak-2 Bidders Out There? (ATTN: Bo Yin)

interests / rec.games.bridge / Re: Any Bailey Weak-2 Bidders Out There? (ATTN: Bo Yin)

Subject	Author
Re: Any Bailey Weak-2 Bidders Out There? (ATTN: Bo Yin)	Fabulous Pedigree