If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.

Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.

Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.

“Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.

Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.

Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
tissue.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/

Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!

On 4/28/2024 7:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and
> social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>

Good advise.

Too bad for the righties fake science, real science shows that covid
infections increase the chance of these problems by several times the
chance that they occur in the general population, which is little
different in people that have been vaccinated.

On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and
> social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>
>
> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the
> potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a
> series of health complications among younger adults.
>

I know of two instances. One of my friends was vaccinated and a week
later, cut his finger slicing a potato.

Some is long term, but same problem. Another friend last week tripped
on a cord and hurt her knees. Yes, she listed to Fauci too and look
what happened.

On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>
>
> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>
> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.
>
> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>
> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>
> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
> tissue.
>
>
> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>
>
> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!

Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
article you cite. Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
and an event involving a single patient. In real science, that's known
as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
describes is an association from an n=1. That's statistically
meaningless. Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention. Even then,
the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
guidelines. That's the truth about quality science. I spent 14+ years
managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence. I
know what I'm talking about. What are your qualifications?

On 4/28/2024 11:03 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
> On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
>> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>>
>>
>> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>>
>> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.
>>
>> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>>
>> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>>
>> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
>> tissue.
>>
>>
>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>>
>>
>> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!
>
>
> Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
> article you cite. Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
> and an event involving a single patient. In real science, that's known
> as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
> describes is an association from an n=1. That's statistically
> meaningless. Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
> describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
> carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
> cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
> than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention. Even then,
> the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
> establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
> guidelines. That's the truth about quality science. I spent 14+ years
> managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
> subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence. I
> know what I'm talking about. What are your qualifications?

He used to be able to "read" the now going bankrupt lying pundit crap.

In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:10:42 -0700, Bob F
<bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 4/28/2024 11:03 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
>> On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
>>> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>>>
>>> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.
>>>
>>> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>>>
>>> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>>>
>>> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
>>> tissue.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>>>
>>>
>>> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!
>>
>>
>> Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
>> article you cite. Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
>> and an event involving a single patient. In real science, that's known
>> as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
>> describes is an association from an n=1. That's statistically
>> meaningless. Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
>> describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
>> carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
>> cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
>> than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention. Even then,
>> the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
>> establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
>> guidelines. That's the truth about quality science. I spent 14+ years
>> managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
>> subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence. I
>> know what I'm talking about. What are your qualifications?

S/he's a trumpie. Trumpies don't need competence. They have their hero.
>He used to be able to "read" the now going bankrupt lying pundit crap.

The original article said it would still be published.

On 4/28/24 11:03, Retirednoguilt wrote:
> On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
>> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>>
>>
>> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>>
>> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.
>>
>> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>>
>> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>>
>> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
>> tissue.
>>
>>
>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>>
>>
>> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!
>
>
> Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
> article you cite. Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
> and an event involving a single patient. In real science, that's known
> as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
> describes is an association from an n=1. That's statistically
> meaningless. Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
> describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
> carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
> cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
> than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention. Even then,
> the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
> establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
> guidelines. That's the truth about quality science. I spent 14+ years
> managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
> subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence. I
> know what I'm talking about. What are your qualifications?

He makes a sound point. This is how science works.
n=1 is not a study.

I might add that science is to prove. You do not start out
with an Axiom and them challenge others to disprove it.
If you "believe" something is the case, it is up to you to
prove it, not others to disprove your axioms.

T wrote:
> On 4/28/24 11:03, Retirednoguilt wrote:
>> On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
>>> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>>>
>>> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.
>>>
>>> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>>>
>>> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>>>
>>> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and
>>> surrounding
>>> tissue.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>>>
>>>
>>> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!
>>
>>
>> Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
>> article you cite.  Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
>> and an event involving a single patient.  In real science, that's known
>> as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
>> describes is an association from an n=1.  That's statistically
>> meaningless.  Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
>> describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
>> carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
>> cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
>> than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention.  Even then,
>> the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
>> establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
>> guidelines.  That's the truth about quality science.  I spent 14+ years
>> managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
>> subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence.  I
>> know what I'm talking about.  What are your qualifications?
>
> He makes a sound point.  This is how science works.
> n=1 is not a study.
>
> I might add that science is to prove.  You do not start out
> with an Axiom and them challenge others to disprove it.
> If you "believe" something is the case, it is up to you to
> prove it, not others to disprove your axioms.
>
>

BigPharma didn't properly test the vaxxxicide injections, they just claimed they were safe and effective.
BigPharma lied, people died.

On 4/29/24 03:48, Skid Marks wrote:
> T wrote:
>> On 4/28/24 11:03, Retirednoguilt wrote:
>>> On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
>>>> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and
>>>> social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the
>>>> potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly
>>>> following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>>>>
>>>> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting
>>>> at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis
>>>> that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19
>>>> vaccination.
>>>>
>>>> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more
>>>> than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>>>>
>>>> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around
>>>> wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month
>>>> when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms
>>>> (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>>>>
>>>> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently
>>>> revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team
>>>> baffled. It was later determined that she had developed
>>>> myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
>>>> tissue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging.
>>>> Safe and effective indeed!
>>>
>>>
>>> Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
>>> article you cite.  Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
>>> and an event involving a single patient.  In real science, that's known
>>> as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
>>> describes is an association from an n=1.  That's statistically
>>> meaningless.  Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
>>> describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
>>> carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
>>> cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
>>> than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention.  Even then,
>>> the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
>>> establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
>>> guidelines.  That's the truth about quality science.  I spent 14+ years
>>> managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
>>> subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence.  I
>>> know what I'm talking about.  What are your qualifications?
>>
>> He makes a sound point.  This is how science works.
>> n=1 is not a study.
>>
>> I might add that science is to prove.  You do not start out
>> with an Axiom and them challenge others to disprove it.
>> If you "believe" something is the case, it is up to you to
>> prove it, not others to disprove your axioms.
>>
>>
>
> BigPharma didn't properly test the vaxxxicide injections, they just
> claimed they were safe and effective.
> BigPharma lied, people died.

The corruption was a thing to behold.

On 4/28/2024 2:40 PM, micky wrote:
> In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:10:42 -0700, Bob F
> <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/28/2024 11:03 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:
>>> On 4/28/2024 10:54 AM, Toljah Soh wrote:
>>>> If you're a Democrat or a socialist Canadian, follow the science and social distance yourself from this post. There's nothing here for you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Medical professionals are beginning to take a closer look at the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly following a series of health complications among younger adults.
>>>>
>>>> Florencia Tarque, a 29-year-old Director of International Recruiting at Puulse Marketing, has come forward with a personal health crisis that her cardiologists suggest may be linked to her COVID-19 vaccination.
>>>>
>>>> “Attention: Cardiologists are now saying my heart problem is more than likely a result of the COVID vaccine,” she wrote on Facebook.
>>>>
>>>> Tarque, an athlete who has maintained a lifestyle centered around wellness, experienced a shocking medical scare earlier this month when she was admitted to the hospital after three electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicated signs of a heart attack.
>>>>
>>>> Despite the alarming EKG results, an angiogram performed urgently revealed no blockages, leaving both Tarque and her medical team baffled. It was later determined that she had developed myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding
>>>> tissue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/cardiologists-identify-covid-19-vaccine-as-possible-cause/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Despite the Democrat's attempt to censor, the truth is emerging. Safe and effective indeed!
>>>
>>>
>>> Speaking as a scientist, there is a severe credibility problem with the
>>> article you cite. Namely, it cites the opinion of a single cardiologist
>>> and an event involving a single patient. In real science, that's known
>>> as a case report, not even qualifying as anecdotal evidence. All it
>>> describes is an association from an n=1. That's statistically
>>> meaningless. Find and cite a reputable medical journal article that
>>> describes a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study with
>>> carefully matched study subject cohorts with sufficient numbers in each
>>> cohort to establish statistical significance with a p value of no more
>>> than 0.05 and ideally 0.01 or less and I'll pay attention. Even then,
>>> the results would warrant a repeat study with an even larger cohort to
>>> establish credibility that might justify a change in clinical
>>> guidelines. That's the truth about quality science. I spent 14+ years
>>> managing hundreds of diverse medical research projects using human
>>> subjects because the powers that be had confidence in my competence. I
>>> know what I'm talking about. What are your qualifications?
>
> S/he's a trumpie. Trumpies don't need competence. They have their hero.
>> He used to be able to "read" the now going bankrupt lying pundit crap.
>
> The original article said it would still be published.

Yeah. Probably when pigs sprout wings and fly.