Scientists are working on proving creationism
and insist that they are VERY close to success.

Scientists. Not usenet trolls, politicians or
wannabe "Influencers": SCIENTISTS state
emphatically that Creationism is the right
answer and that they CAN and WILL prove
it.

Right now, as I type, in labs across the globe
scientists are attempting to create life from
non life. Scientists are trying to prove that
life can originate BY DESIGN of a creator,
and they are going to prove this by example!

"Creationism is real," insists science.
"Creationism is true and we scientists are
going to prove it. We are going to create life
in a lab and show you."

Will it be worth a Nobel Prize? Will the very
first scientist to demonstrate Creation, to
prove that life can come into existence BY
DESIGN win a Nobel Prize for his efforts?

What else can science prove?

Original sin?

The Immaculate Conception?

The Resurrection of Christ?

Who knows? But at the rate science is going,
we may yet see scientific proof of God within
our lifetime.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/739902346125049856

On Saturday 20 January 2024 at 05:27:44 UTC, JTEM is my hero wrote:
> Scientists are working on proving creationism
> and insist that they are VERY close to success.
>
> Scientists. Not usenet trolls, politicians or
> wannabe "Influencers": SCIENTISTS state
> emphatically that Creationism is the right
> answer and that they CAN and WILL prove
> it.
>
> Right now, as I type, in labs across the globe
> scientists are attempting to create life from
> non life. Scientists are trying to prove that
> life can originate BY DESIGN of a creator,
> and they are going to prove this by example!
>
> "Creationism is real," insists science.
> "Creationism is true and we scientists are
> going to prove it. We are going to create life
> in a lab and show you."
>
> Will it be worth a Nobel Prize? Will the very
> first scientist to demonstrate Creation, to
> prove that life can come into existence BY
> DESIGN win a Nobel Prize for his efforts?
>
> What else can science prove?
>
> Original sin?
>
> The Immaculate Conception?
>
> The Resurrection of Christ?
>
> Who knows? But at the rate science is going,
> we may yet see scientific proof of God within
> our lifetime.

This is not creationism. Creationism is not about
whether today's living organisms, including human
beings, could be created separately using non-living
matter, it is about whether they actually were.

Robert Carnegie wrote:

> This is not creationism.

Ironically, I was having lunch with some friends earlier,
and I mention all these ~Crazies~ online, and here
yu are "Arguing" that the deliberate act of Creation, and
intelligence Creating life by design, by intent is not
Creation.

Why?

Why not just accept reality?

You have to dishonestly dig these holes, hop in & cover
yourself with some insane definitions game... "While I
define Creation as not Creation so, no."

If the fact that science insists that Creationism is real,
and intend to prove it, makes you so uncomfortable,
why don't you switch your religious beliefs to Panspermia?

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/740026329918046209

On Sunday 21 January 2024 at 21:42:46 UTC, JTEM is my hero wrote:
> Robert Carnegie wrote:
>
> > This is not creationism.
>
> Ironically, I was having lunch with some friends earlier,
> and I mention all these ~Crazies~ online, and here
> yu are "Arguing" that the deliberate act of Creation, and
> intelligence Creating life by design, by intent is not
> Creation.

Creationism is not about
whether today's living organisms, including human
beings, could be created separately using non-living
matter, it is about whether they actually were.

Creation is about whether cows are descended from
something besides other cows or whether cows
started as cows.

If you hand build a new cow in front of me with Science,
that does not change where the cows we already have
came from. You didn't make those.

On 1/22/24 9:55 AM, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> On Sunday 21 January 2024 at 21:42:46 UTC, JTEM is my hero wrote:
>> Robert Carnegie wrote:
>>
>>> This is not creationism.
>>
>> Ironically, I was having lunch with some friends earlier,
>> and I mention all these ~Crazies~ online, and here
>> yu are "Arguing" that the deliberate act of Creation, and
>> intelligence Creating life by design, by intent is not
>> Creation.
>
> Creationism is not about
> whether today's living organisms, including human
> beings, could be created separately using non-living
> matter, it is about whether they actually were.
>
> Creation is about whether cows are descended from
> something besides other cows or whether cows
> started as cows.
>
> If you hand build a new cow in front of me with Science,
> that does not change where the cows we already have
> came from. You didn't make those.
>
Are you perhaps unfamiliar with this particular troll?

On 1/22/24 10:12 AM, John Harshman wrote:
> On 1/22/24 9:55 AM, Robert Carnegie wrote:
>> On Sunday 21 January 2024 at 21:42:46 UTC, JTEM is my hero wrote:
>>> Robert Carnegie wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is not creationism.
>>>
>>> Ironically, I was having lunch with some friends earlier,
>>> and I mention all these ~Crazies~ online, and here
>>> yu are "Arguing" that the deliberate act of Creation, and
>>> intelligence Creating life by design, by intent is not
>>> Creation.
>>
>> Creationism is not about
>> whether today's living organisms, including human
>> beings, could be created separately using non-living
>> matter, it is about whether they actually were.
>>
>> Creation is about whether cows are descended from
>> something besides other cows or whether cows
>> started as cows.
>>
>> If you hand build a new cow in front of me with Science,
>> that does not change where the cows we already have
>> came from.  You didn't make those.
>>
> Are you perhaps unfamiliar with this particular troll?
>
Exactly. The JTEM troll sounds unlike the Glenn troll (who hasn't been
around for a while), but both have the same goal: make responders look
foolish. That they also appear even more so doesn't bother either in
the least.

Hmmm. Ok, let's give this a go. What the heck.

JTEM is my hero wrote:
>
> Scientists are working on proving creationism
> and insist that they are VERY close to success.

Name some of these "scientists" ->

> Scientists. Not usenet trolls, politicians or
> wannabe "Influencers": SCIENTISTS state
> emphatically that Creationism is the right
> answer and that they CAN and WILL prove
> it.

Please provide some quotes from these "scientists" ->

> Right now, as I type, in labs across the globe

Labs such as ->

> scientists are attempting to create life from
> non life. Scientists are trying to prove that
> life can originate BY DESIGN of a creator,
> and they are going to prove this by example!
>
> "Creationism is real," insists science.
> "Creationism is true and we scientists are
> going to prove it. We are going to create life
> in a lab and show you."

And what peer reviewd journal did this appear in ->

> Will it be worth a Nobel Prize? Will the very
> first scientist to demonstrate Creation, to
> prove that life can come into existence BY
> DESIGN win a Nobel Prize for his efforts?
>
> What else can science prove?

That you're not an idiot?

Robert Carnegie wrote:

> Creationism is not about

You make everything about you.

Here you are playing mindless definition games, in
order to protect you from the truth... which is that
you're an emotional not an intellectual.

An intelligence Creating life intentionally, by design is
Creation.

Get over it. Move on.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/740174235998240768

erik simpson wrote:

> sounds unlike the Glenn troll (who hasn't been
> around for a while), but both

"Trolls say that Creation is Creation and that believing
an Intelligence can Create life from non life --
Creationism -- is trolling cus that's what trolls do. Trolls
believe scientists when they tell them that they are going
to Create life... trolls do that.."

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/740174235998240768

Pro Plyd wrote:

> JTEM is my hero wrote:
> >
> > Scientists are working on proving creationism
> > and insist that they are VERY close to success.

> Name some of these "scientists" ->

Are you retarded? Because you appear to be disputing
the fact that I stated but, you'd have to be retarded to
do that.

> > Scientists. Not usenet trolls, politicians or
> > wannabe "Influencers": SCIENTISTS state
> > emphatically that Creationism is the right
> > answer and that they CAN and WILL prove
> > it.

> Please provide some quotes from these "scientists" ->

Again. You're literally. retarded. You're actually
disputing the fact that science has been trying to
spawn life from non life, under laboratory conditions.

> > Right now, as I type, in labs across the globe

> Labs such as ->

Look. You're not bright, or mentally healthy, but you're
"Arguing" that nobody is trying to Create life from
non life in a laboratory.

> > scientists are attempting to create life from
> > non life. Scientists are trying to prove that
> > life can originate BY DESIGN of a creator,
> > and they are going to prove this by example!
> >
> > "Creationism is real," insists science.
> > "Creationism is true and we scientists are
> > going to prove it. We are going to create life
> > in a lab and show you."

> And what peer reviewd journal did this appear in ->

You are so fucked up, so stupid that you think that
by parading your astounding ignorance, not to mention
your impressive array of mental disorders, you can
impress someone... or yourself at least.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/740174235998240768

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 21:23:02 -0800 (PST), JTEM is my hero
<jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Scientists are working on proving creationism
>and insist that they are VERY close to success.
>
>Scientists. Not usenet trolls, politicians or
>wannabe "Influencers": SCIENTISTS state
>emphatically that Creationism is the right
>answer and that they CAN and WILL prove
>it.
>
>Right now, as I type, in labs across the globe
>scientists are attempting to create life from
>non life. Scientists are trying to prove that
>life can originate BY DESIGN of a creator,
>and they are going to prove this by example!
>
>"Creationism is real," insists science.
>"Creationism is true and we scientists are
>going to prove it. We are going to create life
>in a lab and show you."

Ha, my strategy of creating men in my own image worked! Now I can
finally retire and let you humans continue my work. - God