F.Y.I. I'm seeing 70 messages queued for dizum.com

452 4.3.1 Insufficient system storage

--
Grant. . . .

In article <uktumc$q28$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
>
> F.Y.I. I'm seeing 70 messages queued for dizum.com
>
> 452 4.3.1 Insufficient system storage

Proably all mine, lol.

On 12/8/23 00:03, kcg wrote:
> Proably all mine, lol.

I would not laugh at doing something that may be tantamount to a denial
of service against part of the remailer community. :-/

Grant. . . .

In article <=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?
=3Drn3hRX9reqJ4$Ma@59.195.104.125=3D?U=3D?UTF-8?Q?T?=3DF-8?Q?
=3DF0=3D9F=3D8C=3DBA?=3D>, felchbag <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:54:07 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Grant Taylor
> <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> determined that the following was of
not
> great importance to Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> and
> subsequently decided to NOT freely share it with us in
> <ukueif$tnd$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>:
>
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= On 12/8/23 00:03, kcg wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
Proably all mine, lol.
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= I would not laugh at doing
something that may be tantamount to a denial
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= of service against part of the
remailer community. :-/
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Grant. . . .
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?=
>
> Dizum's bloated local storage has /what/ to do with 70 queued
messages, fuckwit drama queen?
>
> It takes real effort to let a server tank itself with its own
logfiles. Don't forget to publicly fellate the admin once they
unfuck their shitbox!

Ever do any ASN mods and have to troubleshoot with IXPs you
imperceptive transvestite?

That's more important than screwing around with one mail server at
this point.

In alt.privacy.anon-server ????????????????????????????????????????Jen???????????????????????????????????????? Dershmender ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

fixed.

--
Alex de Joode

In article <20231208.010337.597404a8@erienetworks.net>
kcg <remailer@domain.invalid> wrote:
>
> In article <uktumc$q28$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
> >
> > F.Y.I. I'm seeing 70 messages queued for dizum.com
> >
> > 452 4.3.1 Insufficient system storage
>
> Proably all mine, lol.

+1

In article <ukueif$tnd$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
>
> On 12/8/23 00:03, kcg wrote:
> > Proably all mine, lol.
>
> I would not laugh at doing something that may be tantamount to a
denial
> of service against part of the remailer community. :-/

I send 30+ emails or usenet postings per day.

Those submissions are further fragmented by the supporting
framework.

Emails are generally efficient resulting in 2 to 3 chunks, each one
a separate email, much more if there is an attachment.

A single posting with 3 copies can result in a much higher quantity
of chunks, anywhere from 18 to 36, all resulting in separate emails
which is nothing compared to reported historical traffic.

Your attention is invited to the reported submission totals in the
links below.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.privacy.anon-server/c/fw-" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/g/alt.privacy.anon-server/c/fw-
75dqF5RQ/m/jfD68UqoAQAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.privacy.anon-
server/c/besGiGIhTGI/m/zRho8x9mAAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.privacy.anon-
server/c/NIUq4SiwtRk/m/755G2P3kAgAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.privacy.anon-
server/c/0x7JRSww9sc/m/yyZoo6NwAgAJ

I recall a poster, possibly the one above, claiming to have sent
posts resulting in over 21,XXX chunks in a single day.